Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT allowed the appeal and modified the adjudicating authority's order dated 19.07.2024, holding that the appellant is a secured creditor of the corporate debtor by virtue of a statutory charge over the debtor's assets. The Tribunal, relying on Supreme Court precedent interpreting analogous statutory charge provisions, treated the appellant's dues as secured government/statutory dues rather than unsecured operational claims and distinguished liabilities payable to statutory corporations from ordinary government dues. The appellant's prayer to be declared a secured creditor was granted and the impugned order set aside to that extent, with the appeal disposed accordingly.
NCLAT allowed the appeal and modified the adjudicating authority's order dated 19.07.2024, holding that the appellant is a secured creditor of the corporate debtor by virtue of a statutory charge over the debtor's assets. The Tribunal, relying on Supreme Court precedent interpreting analogous statutory charge provisions, treated the appellant's dues as secured government/statutory dues rather than unsecured operational claims and distinguished liabilities payable to statutory corporations from ordinary government dues. The appellant's prayer to be declared a secured creditor was granted and the impugned order set aside to that extent, with the appeal disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.