<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant declared secured creditor by statutory charge; dues treated as secured government statutory dues, order modified accordingly.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92958</link>
    <description>NCLAT allowed the appeal and modified the adjudicating authority&#039;s order dated 19.07.2024, holding that the appellant is a secured creditor of the corporate debtor by virtue of a statutory charge over the debtor&#039;s assets. The Tribunal, relying on Supreme Court precedent interpreting analogous statutory charge provisions, treated the appellant&#039;s dues as secured government/statutory dues rather than unsecured operational claims and distinguished liabilities payable to statutory corporations from ordinary government dues. The appellant&#039;s prayer to be declared a secured creditor was granted and the impugned order set aside to that extent, with the appeal disposed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 09:51:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 09:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant declared secured creditor by statutory charge; dues treated as secured government statutory dues, order modified accordingly.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92958</link>
      <description>NCLAT allowed the appeal and modified the adjudicating authority&#039;s order dated 19.07.2024, holding that the appellant is a secured creditor of the corporate debtor by virtue of a statutory charge over the debtor&#039;s assets. The Tribunal, relying on Supreme Court precedent interpreting analogous statutory charge provisions, treated the appellant&#039;s dues as secured government/statutory dues rather than unsecured operational claims and distinguished liabilities payable to statutory corporations from ordinary government dues. The appellant&#039;s prayer to be declared a secured creditor was granted and the impugned order set aside to that extent, with the appeal disposed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 09:51:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>