Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court order of acquittal, and restored the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and Sessions Court convicting the Accused under section 138 NI Act; the Accused was directed to remit Rs. 7,50,000 by fifteen equal monthly instalments of Rs. 50,000. The Court affirmed the applicability of presumptions under ss. 118 and 139 NI Act once cheque execution is admitted, held those presumptions rebuttable but not displaced on the record here, rejected the defence of a signed blank cheque and the contention of the Complainant's alleged incapacity to advance loan for want of evidence, and observed scope for compounding or pleading in mitigation.
SC allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court order of acquittal, and restored the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and Sessions Court convicting the Accused under section 138 NI Act; the Accused was directed to remit Rs. 7,50,000 by fifteen equal monthly instalments of Rs. 50,000. The Court affirmed the applicability of presumptions under ss. 118 and 139 NI Act once cheque execution is admitted, held those presumptions rebuttable but not displaced on the record here, rejected the defence of a signed blank cheque and the contention of the Complainant's alleged incapacity to advance loan for want of evidence, and observed scope for compounding or pleading in mitigation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
