Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT affirmed that amounts paid for borrowed services do not constitute fees for technical services (FTS) under Article 12 of the India-Singapore DTAA for AY 2020-21 and AY 2021-22. Relying on a Co-ordinate Bench decision in the assessee's own earlier years and noting the Departmental Representative's failure to controvert identical facts, the Tribunal concluded such receipts are not taxable as income deemed to accrue or arise in India under the DTAA. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee and decided against the revenue, with relief limited to the specified assessment years.
The ITAT affirmed that amounts paid for borrowed services do not constitute fees for technical services (FTS) under Article 12 of the India-Singapore DTAA for AY 2020-21 and AY 2021-22. Relying on a Co-ordinate Bench decision in the assessee's own earlier years and noting the Departmental Representative's failure to controvert identical facts, the Tribunal concluded such receipts are not taxable as income deemed to accrue or arise in India under the DTAA. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee and decided against the revenue, with relief limited to the specified assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
