Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts towards borrowed services were taxable as fees for technical services under Article 12 of the DTAA between India and Singapore.
Analysis: The dispute was covered by the Tribunal's earlier decisions in the assessee's own case and in connected matters, where similar borrowed service receipts were held not to constitute fees for technical services. The factual matrix for the relevant assessment years was found to be identical, and the Commissioner (Appeals) had granted relief by following the assessee's earlier year decision. No distinguishing material was brought to show that the services rendered satisfied the treaty test for taxation as fees for technical services.
Conclusion: The receipts from borrowed services were not taxable as fees for technical services under Article 12, and the Commissioner (Appeals)'s view was upheld in favour of the assessee.