Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts towards borrowed services were taxable as fees for technical services under Article 12 of the DTAA between India and Singapore.
Analysis: The dispute was covered by the Tribunal's earlier decisions in the assessee's own case and in connected matters, where similar borrowed service receipts were held not to constitute fees for technical services. The factual matrix for the relevant assessment years was found to be identical, and the Commissioner (Appeals) had granted relief by following the assessee's earlier year decision. No distinguishing material was brought to show that the services rendered satisfied the treaty test for taxation as fees for technical services.
Conclusion: The receipts from borrowed services were not taxable as fees for technical services under Article 12, and the Commissioner (Appeals)'s view was upheld in favour of the assessee.