Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC dismissed the appeals, upholding approval and implementation principles under the IBC. It held appellants (erstwhile promoters) had standing to challenge matters affecting guarantor rights but their conduct sought to thwart the CIRP and occasioned delays; NCLT costs against them were affirmed. The Court confirmed the CoC subsists until a resolution plan is implemented or liquidation ordered and retains authority over CIRP decisions. Delays in plan implementation were attributed to criminal and financial investigations impairing handover of unencumbered assets, not to the resolution applicant. Payments for pre-CIRP dues lacked CoC approval and were irregular; entitlement to EBITDA as claimed was unsubstantiated. No substantial question of law arose; appeals dismissed.
The SC dismissed the appeals, upholding approval and implementation principles under the IBC. It held appellants (erstwhile promoters) had standing to challenge matters affecting guarantor rights but their conduct sought to thwart the CIRP and occasioned delays; NCLT costs against them were affirmed. The Court confirmed the CoC subsists until a resolution plan is implemented or liquidation ordered and retains authority over CIRP decisions. Delays in plan implementation were attributed to criminal and financial investigations impairing handover of unencumbered assets, not to the resolution applicant. Payments for pre-CIRP dues lacked CoC approval and were irregular; entitlement to EBITDA as claimed was unsubstantiated. No substantial question of law arose; appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.