Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The SC dismissed the appeals, upholding approval and implementation principles under the IBC. It held appellants (erstwhile promoters) had standing to challenge matters affecting guarantor rights but their conduct sought to thwart the CIRP and occasioned delays; NCLT costs against them were affirmed. The Court confirmed the CoC subsists until a resolution plan is implemented or liquidation ordered and retains authority over CIRP decisions. Delays in plan implementation were attributed to criminal and financial investigations impairing handover of unencumbered assets, not to the resolution applicant. Payments for pre-CIRP dues lacked CoC approval and were irregular; entitlement to EBITDA as claimed was unsubstantiated. No substantial question of law arose; appeals dismissed.