Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The HC held that, upon approval of the resolution plan on 17.03.2023, all tax liabilities of the corporate debtor for the pre-approval period stood waived and extinguished, rendering the petitioner not liable for the disputed ineligible input tax credit and any failure to declare tax for FY 2020-21. Relying on Supreme Court authority that successful resolution applicants must not be confronted with undecided claims post-approval, the court found no jurisdiction for respondents to issue the impugned notices and show-cause communications. Consequently the impugned orders and SCNs were set aside and the petition was allowed, relieving the petitioner of the contested pre-approval tax obligations.
The HC held that, upon approval of the resolution plan on 17.03.2023, all tax liabilities of the corporate debtor for the pre-approval period stood waived and extinguished, rendering the petitioner not liable for the disputed ineligible input tax credit and any failure to declare tax for FY 2020-21. Relying on Supreme Court authority that successful resolution applicants must not be confronted with undecided claims post-approval, the court found no jurisdiction for respondents to issue the impugned notices and show-cause communications. Consequently the impugned orders and SCNs were set aside and the petition was allowed, relieving the petitioner of the contested pre-approval tax obligations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.