Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether GST demands, adjudication orders and show-cause notices for periods prior to approval and implementation of the resolution plan could be sustained after the resolution plan was approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: On approval of the resolution plan, all claims not forming part of the plan stand frozen and are binding in the manner contemplated by Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The legal position applied is that a successful resolution applicant takes over the corporate debtor on a clean slate, and statutory dues of the Central or State Government that are not included in the resolution plan stand extinguished. The Court applied this principle to the impugned GST proceedings and held that, once the resolution plan had been approved and implemented, there was no basis to continue or initiate recovery proceedings for pre-approval liabilities.
Conclusion: The impugned GST orders, notices and allied coercive proceedings for the pre-approval period could not be sustained and were quashed.