Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The HC held that, upon approval of the resolution plan on 17.03.2023, all tax liabilities of the corporate debtor for the pre-approval period stood waived and extinguished, rendering the petitioner not liable for the disputed ineligible input tax credit and any failure to declare tax for FY 2020-21. Relying on Supreme Court authority that successful resolution applicants must not be confronted with undecided claims post-approval, the court found no jurisdiction for respondents to issue the impugned notices and show-cause communications. Consequently the impugned orders and SCNs were set aside and the petition was allowed, relieving the petitioner of the contested pre-approval tax obligations.
The HC held that, upon approval of the resolution plan on 17.03.2023, all tax liabilities of the corporate debtor for the pre-approval period stood waived and extinguished, rendering the petitioner not liable for the disputed ineligible input tax credit and any failure to declare tax for FY 2020-21. Relying on Supreme Court authority that successful resolution applicants must not be confronted with undecided claims post-approval, the court found no jurisdiction for respondents to issue the impugned notices and show-cause communications. Consequently the impugned orders and SCNs were set aside and the petition was allowed, relieving the petitioner of the contested pre-approval tax obligations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.