All appeals dismissed; finding of anti-competitive bid-rigging upheld under Sections 3(3)(c), 3(3)(d) read with 3(1); cease-and-desist and total-turno...
Central Government notifies 11.541-hectare Special Economic Zone for semiconductor manufacturing; Approval Committee constituted, ICD status effective...
Government appoints National Customs Targeting Centre-Passenger director as customs officer with powers under PNR Regulations, 2022 and Sections 30A, ...
HC held that the provisional attachment under the PMLA is a two-stage scheme: the ED may provisionally attach property upon recording cogent reasons to believe, but confirmation is subject to independent adjudication by the Adjudicating Authority under s.8. The Adjudicating Authority performs quasi-judicial functions and must afford notice, hearing, evidence and reasoned determination. Where notice/summons for adjudication under s.5(3) issued beyond the 180-day period and the summons/notice expired without adjudicatory action under s.8(3), the extension principles applicable to quasi-judicial limitation periods apply; accordingly the petition challenging the attachment was disposed of consistent with those legal tenets.
HC held that the provisional attachment under the PMLA is a two-stage scheme: the ED may provisionally attach property upon recording cogent reasons to believe, but confirmation is subject to independent adjudication by the Adjudicating Authority under s.8. The Adjudicating Authority performs quasi-judicial functions and must afford notice, hearing, evidence and reasoned determination. Where notice/summons for adjudication under s.5(3) issued beyond the 180-day period and the summons/notice expired without adjudicatory action under s.8(3), the extension principles applicable to quasi-judicial limitation periods apply; accordingly the petition challenging the attachment was disposed of consistent with those legal tenets.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
