<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Provisional PMLA attachment is two-stage: ED can attach, confirmation under s.8 requires notice, hearing and reasoned order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92893</link>
    <description>HC held that the provisional attachment under the PMLA is a two-stage scheme: the ED may provisionally attach property upon recording cogent reasons to believe, but confirmation is subject to independent adjudication by the Adjudicating Authority under s.8. The Adjudicating Authority performs quasi-judicial functions and must afford notice, hearing, evidence and reasoned determination. Where notice/summons for adjudication under s.5(3) issued beyond the 180-day period and the summons/notice expired without adjudicatory action under s.8(3), the extension principles applicable to quasi-judicial limitation periods apply; accordingly the petition challenging the attachment was disposed of consistent with those legal tenets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Provisional PMLA attachment is two-stage: ED can attach, confirmation under s.8 requires notice, hearing and reasoned order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92893</link>
      <description>HC held that the provisional attachment under the PMLA is a two-stage scheme: the ED may provisionally attach property upon recording cogent reasons to believe, but confirmation is subject to independent adjudication by the Adjudicating Authority under s.8. The Adjudicating Authority performs quasi-judicial functions and must afford notice, hearing, evidence and reasoned determination. Where notice/summons for adjudication under s.5(3) issued beyond the 180-day period and the summons/notice expired without adjudicatory action under s.8(3), the extension principles applicable to quasi-judicial limitation periods apply; accordingly the petition challenging the attachment was disposed of consistent with those legal tenets.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>