Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC allows the tax revision and restores the AO's assessment under Section 3B of the TNGST Act. The court finds that two separately incorporated companies (hereafter Company A and Company B), although sharing common directors, are distinct legal persons; materials purchased by Company A from other States and used in construction, then transferred to Company B, constitute a transfer of property in goods involved in execution of a works contract and are taxable on the value of goods used. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal erred in treating the concerns as one and the same merely due to common directorship. The AO's levy under Section 3B is upheld and the revision is allowed.
HC allows the tax revision and restores the AO's assessment under Section 3B of the TNGST Act. The court finds that two separately incorporated companies (hereafter Company A and Company B), although sharing common directors, are distinct legal persons; materials purchased by Company A from other States and used in construction, then transferred to Company B, constitute a transfer of property in goods involved in execution of a works contract and are taxable on the value of goods used. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal erred in treating the concerns as one and the same merely due to common directorship. The AO's levy under Section 3B is upheld and the revision is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
