<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 3B upheld: Materials transferred between related companies taxed as goods used in works contract</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92887</link>
    <description>HC allows the tax revision and restores the AO&#039;s assessment under Section 3B of the TNGST Act. The court finds that two separately incorporated companies (hereafter Company A and Company B), although sharing common directors, are distinct legal persons; materials purchased by Company A from other States and used in construction, then transferred to Company B, constitute a transfer of property in goods involved in execution of a works contract and are taxable on the value of goods used. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal erred in treating the concerns as one and the same merely due to common directorship. The AO&#039;s levy under Section 3B is upheld and the revision is allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:26:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 3B upheld: Materials transferred between related companies taxed as goods used in works contract</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92887</link>
      <description>HC allows the tax revision and restores the AO&#039;s assessment under Section 3B of the TNGST Act. The court finds that two separately incorporated companies (hereafter Company A and Company B), although sharing common directors, are distinct legal persons; materials purchased by Company A from other States and used in construction, then transferred to Company B, constitute a transfer of property in goods involved in execution of a works contract and are taxable on the value of goods used. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal erred in treating the concerns as one and the same merely due to common directorship. The AO&#039;s levy under Section 3B is upheld and the revision is allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:26:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>