Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that under the statutory SVLDR scheme and attendant CBIC instructions (including the provision that co-noticees apply after the principal has settled), a principal's valid settlement and issuance of SVLDR certification can result in discharge or exoneration of co-noticees from penalty liability on equitable and natural justice grounds. The Tribunal recognised that administrative delays in issuing certificates and the scheme's limited window justified extending the settlement benefit to co-accused who could not timely apply, and affirmed that the co-noticees were rightly accorded relief following principal settlement. A prior High Court decision under settlement commission provisions was distinguished.
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that under the statutory SVLDR scheme and attendant CBIC instructions (including the provision that co-noticees apply after the principal has settled), a principal's valid settlement and issuance of SVLDR certification can result in discharge or exoneration of co-noticees from penalty liability on equitable and natural justice grounds. The Tribunal recognised that administrative delays in issuing certificates and the scheme's limited window justified extending the settlement benefit to co-accused who could not timely apply, and affirmed that the co-noticees were rightly accorded relief following principal settlement. A prior High Court decision under settlement commission provisions was distinguished.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.