<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Principal&#039;s SVLDR settlement and certificate can exonerate co-noticees from penalties when administrative delay prevents timely co-application</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92824</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that under the statutory SVLDR scheme and attendant CBIC instructions (including the provision that co-noticees apply after the principal has settled), a principal&#039;s valid settlement and issuance of SVLDR certification can result in discharge or exoneration of co-noticees from penalty liability on equitable and natural justice grounds. The Tribunal recognised that administrative delays in issuing certificates and the scheme&#039;s limited window justified extending the settlement benefit to co-accused who could not timely apply, and affirmed that the co-noticees were rightly accorded relief following principal settlement. A prior High Court decision under settlement commission provisions was distinguished.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:37:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Principal&#039;s SVLDR settlement and certificate can exonerate co-noticees from penalties when administrative delay prevents timely co-application</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92824</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that under the statutory SVLDR scheme and attendant CBIC instructions (including the provision that co-noticees apply after the principal has settled), a principal&#039;s valid settlement and issuance of SVLDR certification can result in discharge or exoneration of co-noticees from penalty liability on equitable and natural justice grounds. The Tribunal recognised that administrative delays in issuing certificates and the scheme&#039;s limited window justified extending the settlement benefit to co-accused who could not timely apply, and affirmed that the co-noticees were rightly accorded relief following principal settlement. A prior High Court decision under settlement commission provisions was distinguished.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:37:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>