Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order dated 13.08.2025 directing the appellant to vacate the premises and to pay outstanding licence/occupation charges for the period of continued possession. The Tribunal held the one-month termination notice issued by the RP under clauses 10 and 19 of the leave-and-licence agreement was valid; absence of RERA proceedings did not preclude termination. The Tribunal further ruled that consequential relief for unpaid licence fees could properly be granted while directing vacation, and that refusal to grant such relief would not protect the appellant's continued occupation. Impugned orders in I.A. Nos. 852, 1404 and 1100 of 2025 were upheld; appeal disposed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order dated 13.08.2025 directing the appellant to vacate the premises and to pay outstanding licence/occupation charges for the period of continued possession. The Tribunal held the one-month termination notice issued by the RP under clauses 10 and 19 of the leave-and-licence agreement was valid; absence of RERA proceedings did not preclude termination. The Tribunal further ruled that consequential relief for unpaid licence fees could properly be granted while directing vacation, and that refusal to grant such relief would not protect the appellant's continued occupation. Impugned orders in I.A. Nos. 852, 1404 and 1100 of 2025 were upheld; appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
