Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order dated 13.08.2025 directing the appellant to vacate the premises and to pay outstanding licence/occupation charges for the period of continued possession. The Tribunal held the one-month termination notice issued by the RP under clauses 10 and 19 of the leave-and-licence agreement was valid; absence of RERA proceedings did not preclude termination. The Tribunal further ruled that consequential relief for unpaid licence fees could properly be granted while directing vacation, and that refusal to grant such relief would not protect the appellant's continued occupation. Impugned orders in I.A. Nos. 852, 1404 and 1100 of 2025 were upheld; appeal disposed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order dated 13.08.2025 directing the appellant to vacate the premises and to pay outstanding licence/occupation charges for the period of continued possession. The Tribunal held the one-month termination notice issued by the RP under clauses 10 and 19 of the leave-and-licence agreement was valid; absence of RERA proceedings did not preclude termination. The Tribunal further ruled that consequential relief for unpaid licence fees could properly be granted while directing vacation, and that refusal to grant such relief would not protect the appellant's continued occupation. Impugned orders in I.A. Nos. 852, 1404 and 1100 of 2025 were upheld; appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
