Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
AAAR dismissed the appeal and upheld denial of exemption under entry 3 of Notification No. 12/2017, holding that the appellant's lease of building property to a government department for use as college hostels constitutes a pure supply of immovable property and is not made "in relation to" the statutory functions of panchayats or similar authorities. The authority determined that the phrase "in relation to" must be construed in its legal sense-concerning or pertaining to the statutory function-and the appellant's services were not sufficiently connected to those functions. Accordingly, the claimed exemption was rejected and the appeal was dismissed.
AAAR dismissed the appeal and upheld denial of exemption under entry 3 of Notification No. 12/2017, holding that the appellant's lease of building property to a government department for use as college hostels constitutes a pure supply of immovable property and is not made "in relation to" the statutory functions of panchayats or similar authorities. The authority determined that the phrase "in relation to" must be construed in its legal sense-concerning or pertaining to the statutory function-and the appellant's services were not sufficiently connected to those functions. Accordingly, the claimed exemption was rejected and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.