<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Exemption denied under Entry 3 of Notification No. 12/2017 for lease of building used as college hostels-pure immovable supply</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92773</link>
    <description>AAAR dismissed the appeal and upheld denial of exemption under entry 3 of Notification No. 12/2017, holding that the appellant&#039;s lease of building property to a government department for use as college hostels constitutes a pure supply of immovable property and is not made &quot;in relation to&quot; the statutory functions of panchayats or similar authorities. The authority determined that the phrase &quot;in relation to&quot; must be construed in its legal sense-concerning or pertaining to the statutory function-and the appellant&#039;s services were not sufficiently connected to those functions. Accordingly, the claimed exemption was rejected and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Exemption denied under Entry 3 of Notification No. 12/2017 for lease of building used as college hostels-pure immovable supply</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92773</link>
      <description>AAAR dismissed the appeal and upheld denial of exemption under entry 3 of Notification No. 12/2017, holding that the appellant&#039;s lease of building property to a government department for use as college hostels constitutes a pure supply of immovable property and is not made &quot;in relation to&quot; the statutory functions of panchayats or similar authorities. The authority determined that the phrase &quot;in relation to&quot; must be construed in its legal sense-concerning or pertaining to the statutory function-and the appellant&#039;s services were not sufficiently connected to those functions. Accordingly, the claimed exemption was rejected and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>