TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The AT affirmed the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, upholding the PAO dated 22.12.2017 under ss.24(4)(a)(i) and 24(4)(b)(i) of the PBPTA. The Tribunal found the Appellant failed to adduce evidence of delivery or transportation of the alleged gold, and discrepancies-invoice shortfall, unexplained credits to a third party's account, post-invoice bank transfers, and transactions confined to the demonetisation period-rendered the dealings suspect. The Appellant's failure to undertake due diligence and the production of a fraudulent PAN, corroborated by investigative statements, led the AT to conclude the receipts totalling approximately Rs.51.7 lakh constituted benami transactions within the meaning of s.2(9A) PBPTA.
The AT affirmed the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, upholding the PAO dated 22.12.2017 under ss.24(4)(a)(i) and 24(4)(b)(i) of the PBPTA. The Tribunal found the Appellant failed to adduce evidence of delivery or transportation of the alleged gold, and discrepancies-invoice shortfall, unexplained credits to a third party's account, post-invoice bank transfers, and transactions confined to the demonetisation period-rendered the dealings suspect. The Appellant's failure to undertake due diligence and the production of a fraudulent PAN, corroborated by investigative statements, led the AT to conclude the receipts totalling approximately Rs.51.7 lakh constituted benami transactions within the meaning of s.2(9A) PBPTA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
