Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed the appeal and affirmed the respondent's and CESTAT's decisions, holding that the appellant failed to comply with the notification's procedural deadline for claiming fixation of the special rebate for FY 2009-10 and thus cannot obtain relief. The court found no provision in N/N.20/2007-CE making issuance of an Eligibility Certificate a precondition to claim the special rebate; consequently the appellant's contention that the respondent's certificate was prerequisite was rejected. Although the respondent had earlier indicated potential eligibility, the appellant did not file the requisite application by 30 September 2009 (nor within the 30-day condonation), and there was no ground to interfere with the impugned orders.
HC dismissed the appeal and affirmed the respondent's and CESTAT's decisions, holding that the appellant failed to comply with the notification's procedural deadline for claiming fixation of the special rebate for FY 2009-10 and thus cannot obtain relief. The court found no provision in N/N.20/2007-CE making issuance of an Eligibility Certificate a precondition to claim the special rebate; consequently the appellant's contention that the respondent's certificate was prerequisite was rejected. Although the respondent had earlier indicated potential eligibility, the appellant did not file the requisite application by 30 September 2009 (nor within the 30-day condonation), and there was no ground to interfere with the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
