Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC dismissed the appeal and affirmed the respondent's and CESTAT's decisions, holding that the appellant failed to comply with the notification's procedural deadline for claiming fixation of the special rebate for FY 2009-10 and thus cannot obtain relief. The court found no provision in N/N.20/2007-CE making issuance of an Eligibility Certificate a precondition to claim the special rebate; consequently the appellant's contention that the respondent's certificate was prerequisite was rejected. Although the respondent had earlier indicated potential eligibility, the appellant did not file the requisite application by 30 September 2009 (nor within the 30-day condonation), and there was no ground to interfere with the impugned orders.
HC dismissed the appeal and affirmed the respondent's and CESTAT's decisions, holding that the appellant failed to comply with the notification's procedural deadline for claiming fixation of the special rebate for FY 2009-10 and thus cannot obtain relief. The court found no provision in N/N.20/2007-CE making issuance of an Eligibility Certificate a precondition to claim the special rebate; consequently the appellant's contention that the respondent's certificate was prerequisite was rejected. Although the respondent had earlier indicated potential eligibility, the appellant did not file the requisite application by 30 September 2009 (nor within the 30-day condonation), and there was no ground to interfere with the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
