Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that amounts paid under an Assistance and Service Agreement for setting up plant, providing technical assistance and post-installation support are not includible in the assessable value of imported capital goods under Rule 10(1)(c) of the CVR, 2007 where the agreement does not make such payments a condition of import nor establish a direct nexus with the import of specific tools/spares. The Tribunal, after considering higher-court precedent on when technical/royalty payments may be added, found the agreement distinguishable on its terms, set aside the impugned valuation addition, and allowed the appellant's appeal.
CESTAT held that amounts paid under an Assistance and Service Agreement for setting up plant, providing technical assistance and post-installation support are not includible in the assessable value of imported capital goods under Rule 10(1)(c) of the CVR, 2007 where the agreement does not make such payments a condition of import nor establish a direct nexus with the import of specific tools/spares. The Tribunal, after considering higher-court precedent on when technical/royalty payments may be added, found the agreement distinguishable on its terms, set aside the impugned valuation addition, and allowed the appellant's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
