Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT held that amounts paid under an Assistance and Service Agreement for setting up plant, providing technical assistance and post-installation support are not includible in the assessable value of imported capital goods under Rule 10(1)(c) of the CVR, 2007 where the agreement does not make such payments a condition of import nor establish a direct nexus with the import of specific tools/spares. The Tribunal, after considering higher-court precedent on when technical/royalty payments may be added, found the agreement distinguishable on its terms, set aside the impugned valuation addition, and allowed the appellant's appeal.
CESTAT held that amounts paid under an Assistance and Service Agreement for setting up plant, providing technical assistance and post-installation support are not includible in the assessable value of imported capital goods under Rule 10(1)(c) of the CVR, 2007 where the agreement does not make such payments a condition of import nor establish a direct nexus with the import of specific tools/spares. The Tribunal, after considering higher-court precedent on when technical/royalty payments may be added, found the agreement distinguishable on its terms, set aside the impugned valuation addition, and allowed the appellant's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
