Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld the impugned order and dismissed the appeal. The Tribunal found the Section 9 petition maintainable: the last invoice dated 2 Nov 2013 became due on 2 Dec 2013, and the Corporate Debtor's ledger entry acknowledging debt on 17 May 2016 together with a part payment by cheque cleared 20 May 2016 constituted acknowledgment/part performance sufficient to extend the limitation under Sections 18 and 19 of the Limitation Act, rendering the application timely. Alleged pre-existing dispute was held inadmissible: the Corporate Debtor had not raised the dispute prior to its reply before the adjudicating authority, produced no supporting evidence, and failed to respond to statutory notice, so the asserted dispute was rejected.
NCLAT upheld the impugned order and dismissed the appeal. The Tribunal found the Section 9 petition maintainable: the last invoice dated 2 Nov 2013 became due on 2 Dec 2013, and the Corporate Debtor's ledger entry acknowledging debt on 17 May 2016 together with a part payment by cheque cleared 20 May 2016 constituted acknowledgment/part performance sufficient to extend the limitation under Sections 18 and 19 of the Limitation Act, rendering the application timely. Alleged pre-existing dispute was held inadmissible: the Corporate Debtor had not raised the dispute prior to its reply before the adjudicating authority, produced no supporting evidence, and failed to respond to statutory notice, so the asserted dispute was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
