Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC, exercising extraordinary writ jurisdiction, set aside the impugned order refusing rectification under s.161 of the GST Act and ordered correction of a clerical/arithmetic error in the electronically filed figures whereby "Rs. 1,07,916.48" was erroneously recorded as "Rs. 1,07,91,648.00." The matter is remitted to the Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), CT & GST Circle, for consideration of the petition for rectification and for modification of the assessment order under s.73 accordingly. The authority is directed to permit the petitioner to rectify the mistake and give consequential effect to the correction within four weeks of receipt of this order. Petition disposed.
The HC, exercising extraordinary writ jurisdiction, set aside the impugned order refusing rectification under s.161 of the GST Act and ordered correction of a clerical/arithmetic error in the electronically filed figures whereby "Rs. 1,07,916.48" was erroneously recorded as "Rs. 1,07,91,648.00." The matter is remitted to the Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), CT & GST Circle, for consideration of the petition for rectification and for modification of the assessment order under s.73 accordingly. The authority is directed to permit the petitioner to rectify the mistake and give consequential effect to the correction within four weeks of receipt of this order. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
