Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The HC, exercising extraordinary writ jurisdiction, set aside the impugned order refusing rectification under s.161 of the GST Act and ordered correction of a clerical/arithmetic error in the electronically filed figures whereby "Rs. 1,07,916.48" was erroneously recorded as "Rs. 1,07,91,648.00." The matter is remitted to the Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), CT & GST Circle, for consideration of the petition for rectification and for modification of the assessment order under s.73 accordingly. The authority is directed to permit the petitioner to rectify the mistake and give consequential effect to the correction within four weeks of receipt of this order. Petition disposed.
The HC, exercising extraordinary writ jurisdiction, set aside the impugned order refusing rectification under s.161 of the GST Act and ordered correction of a clerical/arithmetic error in the electronically filed figures whereby "Rs. 1,07,916.48" was erroneously recorded as "Rs. 1,07,91,648.00." The matter is remitted to the Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), CT & GST Circle, for consideration of the petition for rectification and for modification of the assessment order under s.73 accordingly. The authority is directed to permit the petitioner to rectify the mistake and give consequential effect to the correction within four weeks of receipt of this order. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
