Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the 3rd respondent's order dated 05.11.2024 adjusting the petitioner's tax refund was unlawful and procedurally defective. The court found the 3rd respondent had issued a notice u/s 245 on 15.10.2024 granting 21 days to reply but effected adjustment before the expiry of that period and while an appeal before the 2nd respondent remained pending, thereby breaching statutory procedure and principles of natural justice. The HC set aside and quashed the impugned adjustment order and related proceedings, rejecting the revenue's contention of procedural regularity. The matter stands remitted to be dealt with in accordance with law.
The HC held that the 3rd respondent's order dated 05.11.2024 adjusting the petitioner's tax refund was unlawful and procedurally defective. The court found the 3rd respondent had issued a notice u/s 245 on 15.10.2024 granting 21 days to reply but effected adjustment before the expiry of that period and while an appeal before the 2nd respondent remained pending, thereby breaching statutory procedure and principles of natural justice. The HC set aside and quashed the impugned adjustment order and related proceedings, rejecting the revenue's contention of procedural regularity. The matter stands remitted to be dealt with in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
