Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC held that the 3rd respondent's order dated 05.11.2024 adjusting the petitioner's tax refund was unlawful and procedurally defective. The court found the 3rd respondent had issued a notice u/s 245 on 15.10.2024 granting 21 days to reply but effected adjustment before the expiry of that period and while an appeal before the 2nd respondent remained pending, thereby breaching statutory procedure and principles of natural justice. The HC set aside and quashed the impugned adjustment order and related proceedings, rejecting the revenue's contention of procedural regularity. The matter stands remitted to be dealt with in accordance with law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
