Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the writ challenging issuance of notice under s.147/148A(b) for reopening assessment on account of alleged bogus commission-related receipts. The court held that where the alleged receipt is declared in books and return, the question whether it represents a spurious transaction resulting in income escaping assessment is a factual determination for the Assessing Officer, not for judicial resolution at the interlocutory stage. The HC found the petitioner's reliance on the cited precedent inapposite on facts and refused to quash the notice, directing the AO to undertake statutory enquiry and elicit responses. WP is dismissed.
The HC dismissed the writ challenging issuance of notice under s.147/148A(b) for reopening assessment on account of alleged bogus commission-related receipts. The court held that where the alleged receipt is declared in books and return, the question whether it represents a spurious transaction resulting in income escaping assessment is a factual determination for the Assessing Officer, not for judicial resolution at the interlocutory stage. The HC found the petitioner's reliance on the cited precedent inapposite on facts and refused to quash the notice, directing the AO to undertake statutory enquiry and elicit responses. WP is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.