<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Writ dismissed: notice under s.147/148A(b) upheld where alleged commission income declared; factual inquiry left to Assessing Officer</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92580</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ challenging issuance of notice under s.147/148A(b) for reopening assessment on account of alleged bogus commission-related receipts. The court held that where the alleged receipt is declared in books and return, the question whether it represents a spurious transaction resulting in income escaping assessment is a factual determination for the Assessing Officer, not for judicial resolution at the interlocutory stage. The HC found the petitioner&#039;s reliance on the cited precedent inapposite on facts and refused to quash the notice, directing the AO to undertake statutory enquiry and elicit responses. WP is dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:31:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:31:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Writ dismissed: notice under s.147/148A(b) upheld where alleged commission income declared; factual inquiry left to Assessing Officer</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92580</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ challenging issuance of notice under s.147/148A(b) for reopening assessment on account of alleged bogus commission-related receipts. The court held that where the alleged receipt is declared in books and return, the question whether it represents a spurious transaction resulting in income escaping assessment is a factual determination for the Assessing Officer, not for judicial resolution at the interlocutory stage. The HC found the petitioner&#039;s reliance on the cited precedent inapposite on facts and refused to quash the notice, directing the AO to undertake statutory enquiry and elicit responses. WP is dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:31:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>