Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the option under s.115BAA, once exercised by filing Form 10-IC, ordinarily cannot be withdrawn; however, where statutory conditions in s.115BAA(2) are not satisfied and the assessee claimed MAT credit under s.115JAA (which is incompatible with the concessional regime), the exercised option is treated as ineffectual for the relevant and subsequent assessment years. The Tribunal invalidated the s.115BAA election in such circumstances, directed remand to the file of the CIT(A) for verification of records and fresh adjudication, and permitted the assessee to compute tax under the pre-115BAA regime to enable a legitimate claim of MAT credit.
ITAT held that the option under s.115BAA, once exercised by filing Form 10-IC, ordinarily cannot be withdrawn; however, where statutory conditions in s.115BAA(2) are not satisfied and the assessee claimed MAT credit under s.115JAA (which is incompatible with the concessional regime), the exercised option is treated as ineffectual for the relevant and subsequent assessment years. The Tribunal invalidated the s.115BAA election in such circumstances, directed remand to the file of the CIT(A) for verification of records and fresh adjudication, and permitted the assessee to compute tax under the pre-115BAA regime to enable a legitimate claim of MAT credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.