Concessional tax regime election under section 115BAA is binding, but non-compliance with statutory conditions can make the option ineffective.

An election under section 115BAA, once validly exercised in the prescribed manner, is binding for subsequent assessment years and cannot later be withdrawn. However, the concessional regime remains available only if its statutory conditions are satisfied; a claim of MAT credit under section 115JAA and filing the return under the normal regime were treated as inconsistent with that option. Applying substantial compliance and beneficial interpretation, the Tribunal held that procedural lapses should not defeat substantive entitlement, but directed verification of MAT credit and fresh tax computation. The option was therefore not accepted as withdrawable, while the computation issue was restored for reconsideration under the old regime.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the option exercised under section 115BAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be withdrawn after filing Form 10-IC. (ii) Whether the assessee's claim of MAT credit and filing of the return under the normal regime rendered the option under section 115BAA invalid, warranting computation under the old regime.

Issue (i): Whether the option exercised under section 115BAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be withdrawn after filing Form 10-IC.

Analysis: The statutory language provides that once the option is exercised in the prescribed manner, it applies to subsequent assessment years and cannot later be withdrawn for the same or any other previous year. The provision therefore creates a binding election once validly made, subject only to the statutory conditions attached to the concessional regime.

Conclusion: The option could not be withdrawn once exercised.

Issue (ii): Whether the assessee's claim of MAT credit and filing of the return under the normal regime rendered the option under section 115BAA invalid, warranting computation under the old regime.

Analysis: The concessional regime under section 115BAA is available only on satisfaction of the prescribed conditions. A claim for MAT credit under section 115JAA is inconsistent with the new regime, and failure to satisfy the statutory conditions makes the option ineffective for the relevant year and subsequent years. The Tribunal also applied the principles of substantial compliance and beneficial interpretation, holding that procedural lapses should not defeat substantive rights where the assessee is otherwise entitled to the relief, while directing verification of the MAT credit claim and the consequent tax computation.

Conclusion: The option under section 115BAA was treated as invalid for the relevant year, and the matter was restored for fresh adjudication with consideration of tax computation under the old regime and MAT credit verification.

Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained partial relief, with the dispute on MAT credit and tax computation sent back for reconsideration, while the statutory election under the concessional regime was not accepted as withdrawable.

Ratio Decidendi: An option under a concessional tax regime may not be withdrawn once validly exercised, but if the assessee fails to satisfy the statutory conditions attached to that regime, the option becomes ineffective and the tax computation must be tested accordingly, with substantive entitlement not defeated by mere procedural lapses.

---