Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC disposed the petition granting petitioners leave to pursue statutory refund remedies, holding that petitioners must file an application under section 119(2)(b) seeking condonation of delay in filing the income-tax return and claiming refund of TDS deducted on compensation. The court noted that sections 237 and 239 govern entitlement and time-bar for refunds and referred to Instruction No.13/2006 permitting Commissioner level condonation for refund claims within prescribed limits. Time during pendency of the writ (filed 25.03.2019) is excluded in computing the six-year limitation for AY 2013-14. Petitioners were afforded eight weeks from the order to file the said application before the Principal Commissioner.
The HC disposed the petition granting petitioners leave to pursue statutory refund remedies, holding that petitioners must file an application under section 119(2)(b) seeking condonation of delay in filing the income-tax return and claiming refund of TDS deducted on compensation. The court noted that sections 237 and 239 govern entitlement and time-bar for refunds and referred to Instruction No.13/2006 permitting Commissioner level condonation for refund claims within prescribed limits. Time during pendency of the writ (filed 25.03.2019) is excluded in computing the six-year limitation for AY 2013-14. Petitioners were afforded eight weeks from the order to file the said application before the Principal Commissioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
