Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s view and dismissed the Revenue's appeal: the profit on sale of a motor vehicle was not taxable as the motor car formed part of a continuing block of assets and the sale consideration was adjusted against the block; additions under section 69C for alleged unexplained import-related expenditure were deleted on documentary evidence; the tribunal directed complete deletion of the addition relating to writers' remuneration (modifying CIT(A)'s 10% disallowance) as surmise-based adjustments were impermissible; a 5% disallowance for transportation/distribution expenses was quashed; the section 143(2) notice was held invalid for non-compliance with CBDT instructions, rendering consequent proceedings void.
ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s view and dismissed the Revenue's appeal: the profit on sale of a motor vehicle was not taxable as the motor car formed part of a continuing block of assets and the sale consideration was adjusted against the block; additions under section 69C for alleged unexplained import-related expenditure were deleted on documentary evidence; the tribunal directed complete deletion of the addition relating to writers' remuneration (modifying CIT(A)'s 10% disallowance) as surmise-based adjustments were impermissible; a 5% disallowance for transportation/distribution expenses was quashed; the section 143(2) notice was held invalid for non-compliance with CBDT instructions, rendering consequent proceedings void.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.