<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue appeal dismissed; motor car sale not taxable, additions under section 69C deleted, section 143(2) notice invalid</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92525</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s view and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal: the profit on sale of a motor vehicle was not taxable as the motor car formed part of a continuing block of assets and the sale consideration was adjusted against the block; additions under section 69C for alleged unexplained import-related expenditure were deleted on documentary evidence; the tribunal directed complete deletion of the addition relating to writers&#039; remuneration (modifying CIT(A)&#039;s 10% disallowance) as surmise-based adjustments were impermissible; a 5% disallowance for transportation/distribution expenses was quashed; the section 143(2) notice was held invalid for non-compliance with CBDT instructions, rendering consequent proceedings void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue appeal dismissed; motor car sale not taxable, additions under section 69C deleted, section 143(2) notice invalid</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92525</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s view and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal: the profit on sale of a motor vehicle was not taxable as the motor car formed part of a continuing block of assets and the sale consideration was adjusted against the block; additions under section 69C for alleged unexplained import-related expenditure were deleted on documentary evidence; the tribunal directed complete deletion of the addition relating to writers&#039; remuneration (modifying CIT(A)&#039;s 10% disallowance) as surmise-based adjustments were impermissible; a 5% disallowance for transportation/distribution expenses was quashed; the section 143(2) notice was held invalid for non-compliance with CBDT instructions, rendering consequent proceedings void.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>