Central Government rescinds 2017 notification creating 4.05-hectare SEZ at Ameenpur after developer de-notification request; state no-objection confir...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10901 to 10920 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal, holding the imported aluminium formwork structure with accessories classifiable under CTH 7610 90 10 and entitled to the exemption at Sl. No. 610 of N/N. 152/2009 (as amended), on grounds that the appellant had self-assessed under the relevant tariff and IGST notification and that the Department had not validly challenged the appellant's assessment prior to issuing the demand. The Tribunal, following a co-ordinate decision, set aside the demand for differential customs duty and declined to restore the duty confirmed in the impugned order; the appellate authority's dropping of penalty was left undisturbed. Appeal disposed.
CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal, holding the imported aluminium formwork structure with accessories classifiable under CTH 7610 90 10 and entitled to the exemption at Sl. No. 610 of N/N. 152/2009 (as amended), on grounds that the appellant had self-assessed under the relevant tariff and IGST notification and that the Department had not validly challenged the appellant's assessment prior to issuing the demand. The Tribunal, following a co-ordinate decision, set aside the demand for differential customs duty and declined to restore the duty confirmed in the impugned order; the appellate authority's dropping of penalty was left undisturbed. Appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
