<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported aluminium formwork with accessories classifiable under CTH 7610 90 10; exemption under Sl. No. 610 N/N.152/2009 upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92521</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding the imported aluminium formwork structure with accessories classifiable under CTH 7610 90 10 and entitled to the exemption at Sl. No. 610 of N/N. 152/2009 (as amended), on grounds that the appellant had self-assessed under the relevant tariff and IGST notification and that the Department had not validly challenged the appellant&#039;s assessment prior to issuing the demand. The Tribunal, following a co-ordinate decision, set aside the demand for differential customs duty and declined to restore the duty confirmed in the impugned order; the appellate authority&#039;s dropping of penalty was left undisturbed. Appeal disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported aluminium formwork with accessories classifiable under CTH 7610 90 10; exemption under Sl. No. 610 N/N.152/2009 upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92521</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding the imported aluminium formwork structure with accessories classifiable under CTH 7610 90 10 and entitled to the exemption at Sl. No. 610 of N/N. 152/2009 (as amended), on grounds that the appellant had self-assessed under the relevant tariff and IGST notification and that the Department had not validly challenged the appellant&#039;s assessment prior to issuing the demand. The Tribunal, following a co-ordinate decision, set aside the demand for differential customs duty and declined to restore the duty confirmed in the impugned order; the appellate authority&#039;s dropping of penalty was left undisturbed. Appeal disposed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>