Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the appeal by the revenue, set aside the tribunal's order and held that the refund crystallized only on 05.09.2023 upon the reassessment order. Consequently the respondent is not entitled to interest from any date anterior to the Section 27(1) refund application (05.08.2022) or from 11.01.2011, since Section 27A permits interest only after three months from receipt of a valid refund application and an order quantifying refund; shifting the interest commencement date earlier would impermissibly rewrite Sections 27/27A. The HC rejected the respondent's contention for rectification of the 12 shipping bills and found no clerical or arithmetical mistake warranting reassessment under Section 154. Appeal allowed.
The HC allowed the appeal by the revenue, set aside the tribunal's order and held that the refund crystallized only on 05.09.2023 upon the reassessment order. Consequently the respondent is not entitled to interest from any date anterior to the Section 27(1) refund application (05.08.2022) or from 11.01.2011, since Section 27A permits interest only after three months from receipt of a valid refund application and an order quantifying refund; shifting the interest commencement date earlier would impermissibly rewrite Sections 27/27A. The HC rejected the respondent's contention for rectification of the 12 shipping bills and found no clerical or arithmetical mistake warranting reassessment under Section 154. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.