Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC allowed the appeal by the revenue, set aside the tribunal's order and held that the refund crystallized only on 05.09.2023 upon the reassessment order. Consequently the respondent is not entitled to interest from any date anterior to the Section 27(1) refund application (05.08.2022) or from 11.01.2011, since Section 27A permits interest only after three months from receipt of a valid refund application and an order quantifying refund; shifting the interest commencement date earlier would impermissibly rewrite Sections 27/27A. The HC rejected the respondent's contention for rectification of the 12 shipping bills and found no clerical or arithmetical mistake warranting reassessment under Section 154. Appeal allowed.
The HC allowed the appeal by the revenue, set aside the tribunal's order and held that the refund crystallized only on 05.09.2023 upon the reassessment order. Consequently the respondent is not entitled to interest from any date anterior to the Section 27(1) refund application (05.08.2022) or from 11.01.2011, since Section 27A permits interest only after three months from receipt of a valid refund application and an order quantifying refund; shifting the interest commencement date earlier would impermissibly rewrite Sections 27/27A. The HC rejected the respondent's contention for rectification of the 12 shipping bills and found no clerical or arithmetical mistake warranting reassessment under Section 154. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
