Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on business/commercial rights arising from manufacturing, supply and maintenance contracts acquired from third parties, finding the disallowance untenable in light of the jurisdictional tribunal's identical prior conclusion in the assessee's own case; accordingly the claimed depreciation is allowable. The Tribunal further held that initiation or imposition of a penalty under s. 270A for alleged under-reporting/misreporting is premature and inadmissible at this stage because any liability for penalty is consequential upon a substantive disallowance which has not been sustained.
The ITAT held that the assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on business/commercial rights arising from manufacturing, supply and maintenance contracts acquired from third parties, finding the disallowance untenable in light of the jurisdictional tribunal's identical prior conclusion in the assessee's own case; accordingly the claimed depreciation is allowable. The Tribunal further held that initiation or imposition of a penalty under s. 270A for alleged under-reporting/misreporting is premature and inadmissible at this stage because any liability for penalty is consequential upon a substantive disallowance which has not been sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.