<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer allowed depreciation on acquired business rights; penalty under s.270A held premature absent substantive disallowance</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92476</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on business/commercial rights arising from manufacturing, supply and maintenance contracts acquired from third parties, finding the disallowance untenable in light of the jurisdictional tribunal&#039;s identical prior conclusion in the assessee&#039;s own case; accordingly the claimed depreciation is allowable. The Tribunal further held that initiation or imposition of a penalty under s. 270A for alleged under-reporting/misreporting is premature and inadmissible at this stage because any liability for penalty is consequential upon a substantive disallowance which has not been sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer allowed depreciation on acquired business rights; penalty under s.270A held premature absent substantive disallowance</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92476</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on business/commercial rights arising from manufacturing, supply and maintenance contracts acquired from third parties, finding the disallowance untenable in light of the jurisdictional tribunal&#039;s identical prior conclusion in the assessee&#039;s own case; accordingly the claimed depreciation is allowable. The Tribunal further held that initiation or imposition of a penalty under s. 270A for alleged under-reporting/misreporting is premature and inadmissible at this stage because any liability for penalty is consequential upon a substantive disallowance which has not been sustained.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>