Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The HC allowed the writ in part, holding that retrospective cancellation of the GST registration was unsustainable where the SCN did not propose retrospective cancellation; accordingly the cancellation shall take effect from the date of issuance of the SCN (2 February 2022). The Court observed that, despite delay, it would entertain the petition due to intervening circumstances including the death of a partner and dissolution of the firm. The HC concluded that principles of natural justice were not breached in a manner warranting retrospective relief and disposed of the petition, directing that the impugned order operate prospectively from the SCN date.
The HC allowed the writ in part, holding that retrospective cancellation of the GST registration was unsustainable where the SCN did not propose retrospective cancellation; accordingly the cancellation shall take effect from the date of issuance of the SCN (2 February 2022). The Court observed that, despite delay, it would entertain the petition due to intervening circumstances including the death of a partner and dissolution of the firm. The HC concluded that principles of natural justice were not breached in a manner warranting retrospective relief and disposed of the petition, directing that the impugned order operate prospectively from the SCN date.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.