Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC allowed the writ in part, holding that retrospective cancellation of the GST registration was unsustainable where the SCN did not propose retrospective cancellation; accordingly the cancellation shall take effect from the date of issuance of the SCN (2 February 2022). The Court observed that, despite delay, it would entertain the petition due to intervening circumstances including the death of a partner and dissolution of the firm. The HC concluded that principles of natural justice were not breached in a manner warranting retrospective relief and disposed of the petition, directing that the impugned order operate prospectively from the SCN date.
The HC allowed the writ in part, holding that retrospective cancellation of the GST registration was unsustainable where the SCN did not propose retrospective cancellation; accordingly the cancellation shall take effect from the date of issuance of the SCN (2 February 2022). The Court observed that, despite delay, it would entertain the petition due to intervening circumstances including the death of a partner and dissolution of the firm. The HC concluded that principles of natural justice were not breached in a manner warranting retrospective relief and disposed of the petition, directing that the impugned order operate prospectively from the SCN date.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
