Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
The HC held that, pursuant to Notification No.04/2018 fixing time of supply under a JDA as the date of conveyance or allotment, no GST liability arose on the petitioner at the date of the JDA; subsequent evidence, including the sale deed showing the developer's acquisition of title and favourable findings by the DGGI, confirm the petitioner is not taxable in respect of the Project. Consequently the Rs. 7 crore deposited by the petitioner is refundable, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of deposit. The refund is to be remitted within six weeks. The Revenue's contrary affidavits were rejected insofar as they sought to fix tax liability on the petitioner.
The HC held that, pursuant to Notification No.04/2018 fixing time of supply under a JDA as the date of conveyance or allotment, no GST liability arose on the petitioner at the date of the JDA; subsequent evidence, including the sale deed showing the developer's acquisition of title and favourable findings by the DGGI, confirm the petitioner is not taxable in respect of the Project. Consequently the Rs. 7 crore deposited by the petitioner is refundable, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of deposit. The refund is to be remitted within six weeks. The Revenue's contrary affidavits were rejected insofar as they sought to fix tax liability on the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
