Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC held that, pursuant to Notification No.04/2018 fixing time of supply under a JDA as the date of conveyance or allotment, no GST liability arose on the petitioner at the date of the JDA; subsequent evidence, including the sale deed showing the developer's acquisition of title and favourable findings by the DGGI, confirm the petitioner is not taxable in respect of the Project. Consequently the Rs. 7 crore deposited by the petitioner is refundable, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of deposit. The refund is to be remitted within six weeks. The Revenue's contrary affidavits were rejected insofar as they sought to fix tax liability on the petitioner.
The HC held that, pursuant to Notification No.04/2018 fixing time of supply under a JDA as the date of conveyance or allotment, no GST liability arose on the petitioner at the date of the JDA; subsequent evidence, including the sale deed showing the developer's acquisition of title and favourable findings by the DGGI, confirm the petitioner is not taxable in respect of the Project. Consequently the Rs. 7 crore deposited by the petitioner is refundable, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of deposit. The refund is to be remitted within six weeks. The Revenue's contrary affidavits were rejected insofar as they sought to fix tax liability on the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
