Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The HC declined to finally adjudicate merits in a duty-drawback fraud challenge and permitted the petitioner-alleged controller of multiple entities and IECs who purportedly obtained duty drawbacks without actual supply-to institute an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) by 15 October 2025 in accordance with the statute and rules. If the appeal is lodged by that date it shall not be rejected as time-barred but shall be adjudicated on its merits. The HC expressly refrained from making binding findings, noting any interim observations will not govern the Commissioner (Appeals)'s final adjudication. The writ petition is disposed of.
The HC declined to finally adjudicate merits in a duty-drawback fraud challenge and permitted the petitioner-alleged controller of multiple entities and IECs who purportedly obtained duty drawbacks without actual supply-to institute an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) by 15 October 2025 in accordance with the statute and rules. If the appeal is lodged by that date it shall not be rejected as time-barred but shall be adjudicated on its merits. The HC expressly refrained from making binding findings, noting any interim observations will not govern the Commissioner (Appeals)'s final adjudication. The writ petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.