Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the AO to grant exemption for leave encashment under section 10(10AA) within the revised exemption limit of Rs.25,00,000 as prescribed by the CBDT. The Tribunal held that, notwithstanding employment with a scheduled bank rather than a central or state government department, the claimed leave encashment falls below the newly notified ceiling and is therefore deductible to the extent of the revised limit. The AO's denial of the exemption was set aside and the claim was restored accordingly, subject to compliance with the parameters and limits specified in the CBDT revision.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the AO to grant exemption for leave encashment under section 10(10AA) within the revised exemption limit of Rs.25,00,000 as prescribed by the CBDT. The Tribunal held that, notwithstanding employment with a scheduled bank rather than a central or state government department, the claimed leave encashment falls below the newly notified ceiling and is therefore deductible to the extent of the revised limit. The AO's denial of the exemption was set aside and the claim was restored accordingly, subject to compliance with the parameters and limits specified in the CBDT revision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.