<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer entitled to leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) up to revised Rs.25,00,000 limit after AO&#039;s earlier denial</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92344</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and directed the AO to grant exemption for leave encashment under section 10(10AA) within the revised exemption limit of Rs.25,00,000 as prescribed by the CBDT. The Tribunal held that, notwithstanding employment with a scheduled bank rather than a central or state government department, the claimed leave encashment falls below the newly notified ceiling and is therefore deductible to the extent of the revised limit. The AO&#039;s denial of the exemption was set aside and the claim was restored accordingly, subject to compliance with the parameters and limits specified in the CBDT revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer entitled to leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) up to revised Rs.25,00,000 limit after AO&#039;s earlier denial</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92344</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and directed the AO to grant exemption for leave encashment under section 10(10AA) within the revised exemption limit of Rs.25,00,000 as prescribed by the CBDT. The Tribunal held that, notwithstanding employment with a scheduled bank rather than a central or state government department, the claimed leave encashment falls below the newly notified ceiling and is therefore deductible to the extent of the revised limit. The AO&#039;s denial of the exemption was set aside and the claim was restored accordingly, subject to compliance with the parameters and limits specified in the CBDT revision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>